(Let’s be clear. Why is an Australian constitutional lawyer writing about the UK Constitution? It’s simple. She’s our […]
Parliamentary sovereignty
On 24 September, the UK Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the Prime Minister’s advice to prorogue Parliament was […]
Introduction In a succinct and surprisingly unanimous judgment in Miller and Cherry [2019] UKSC 41 the UK Supreme […]
The purpose of this piece is to examine the legal and constitutional implications of the Miller 2 Judgment. […]
Following the highly anticipated decision of the UK Supreme Court in Cherry/Miller (No 2), commentators have weighed in […]
There have been two competing visions of the constitution battling it out since the Brexit referendum in 2016, […]
Yesterday the Supreme Court handed down its unanimous judgement in Cherry and Others v The Advocate General and […]
Constitutions do many things. They distribute authority amongst public bodies, enshrine important points of substantive principle, and cement […]
Seven points about the Supreme Court judgment in Miller II/Cherry are in danger of being missed amidst the political noise. […]
The chorus that the United Kingdom Supreme Court’s decision on prorogation (R. (on the application of Miller) v […]
