In a recent critical essay for the London Review of Books, Conor Gearty penned a wonderful, if provocative, […]
Category Archive: Judiciary
Stefan Theil: Missing the Forest for the Trees – Deficits in Doctrinal Methods and How Data Can Help
Introduction Law and legal scholarship have a problem: a problem with digesting and analysing the sheer volume of […]
Dualism is considered a staple characteristic of the UK’s constitutional order. Recognised as a necessary derivative of the […]
The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (NZBORA) and the United Kingdom’s Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA) […]
This is the second in a series of two posts on the remedial reforms proposed in the Judicial […]
There are many claims made about decision-making in judicial review. The way that judges do decide, or ought […]
The current blog post considers the failure of the current judicial review reform process, from IRAL onwards, to […]
Much has been written about the government’s judicial review reform project, which has led from IRAL to a […]
In 2009, Vernon Bogdanor wrote about The New British Constitution. His thesis was that a decade of New […]
Policies are not law. Nevertheless, they play a large role in administrative law, providing clarity as to how […]
UK Constitutional Law Association 