One of proposals in the Ministry of Justice’s paper on Judicial Review: Proposals for Further Reform is the […]
Category Archive: Judicial review
Triggered by the government’s consultation paper Judicial Review Proposals for Reforms published in December 2012, much has been […]
Courts and commentators have sometimes said the administrative law doctrine of legitimate expectations is incoherent. They say that […]
As is well known, in Hirst v UK (No 2) the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human […]
To observe that substantive judicial review—and the notions of proportionality and deference in particular—constitute well-trodden ground would be […]
There is much current debate over judicial review, prompted in large part by successive government consultation papers. This […]
The morally and politically charged area of assisted suicide has many of the hallmarks of an insoluble problem. […]
Readers of this blog will be familiar with the controversial reforms to the judicial review procedure in England […]
Marbury v Madison is the most famous judicial decision in US history, written by the most important judge in US […]
In Australia as in England, courts began “reading down” legislative grants of broad and seemingly unfettered discretionary power […]
UK Constitutional Law Association 