It is not surprising or new that the executive plays institutional chess with the courts. Judicial review, though […]
Category Archive: Judicial review
Empirical research into judicial review has recently started to draw attention, as Brian Christopher Jones points out in his […]
The dominant narrative in the discussion over judicial review—and especially in relation to judicial overreach—focuses on major cases, […]
Judicial review judgments possess multi-layered value. For the parties to a case, they are an authoritative record of […]
The new prospective-only quashing order reform proposed by clause 1(1)(29A)(1)(b) of the Judicial Review and Courts Bill 2021 implicates […]
With the UK in the midst of its latest political corruption crisis, the question of the (in)adequacy of […]
This is the second in a series of two posts on the remedial reforms proposed in the Judicial […]
There are many claims made about decision-making in judicial review. The way that judges do decide, or ought […]
This is the first of two posts on the remedial reforms proposed in the Judicial Review and Courts Bill. […]
In the Continuity Bill Reference, the Supreme Court advanced a striking analysis of the implications for devolution of […]
UK Constitutional Law Association 