Information
This entry was posted on November 10, 2011 by Constitutional Law Group in Uncategorized.Shortlink
https://wp.me/p1cVqo-aCRecent Posts
- Jan van Zyl Smit: After Poland’s Attempted Purge of ‘Communist-era’ Judges, Do We Need New International Standards for Post-authoritarian Countries Reforming Their Judiciary? (Part II)
- Jan van Zyl Smit: After Poland’s Attempted Purge of ‘Communist-era’ Judges, Do We Need New International Standards for Post-authoritarian Countries Reforming Their Judiciary? (Part I)
- Kenneth Campbell: Constitutional Dogs That Barked and Dogs That Did Not: The Scottish Continuity Bill in the Supreme Court
Follow us on Twitter
- Jan van Zyl Smit: After Poland’s Attempted Purge of ‘Communist-era’ Judges, Do We Need New International Standards… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 day ago
- Jan van Zyl Smit: After Poland’s Attempted Purge of ‘Communist-era’ Judges, Do We Need New International Standards… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 days ago
- Kenneth Campbell: Constitutional Dogs That Barked and Dogs That Did Not: The Scottish Continuity Bill in the Suprem… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 3 days ago
- Philip Allott: The Problem of Direct Democracy: Brexit and the Tyranny of the Majority ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019/01/10/phi… https://t.co/TI0DMkdTHo 1 week ago
- Robert Craig: Can the Government Use the Royal Prerogative to Extend Article 50? ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019/01/09/rob… 1 week ago
Top Posts & Pages
- Gavin Phillipson and Alison L. Young: Wightman: What Would Be the UK’s Constitutional Requirements to Revoke Article 50?
- Robert Craig: Miller Supreme Court Case Summary
- About UKCLA
- Robert Craig: Can the Government Use the Royal Prerogative to Extend Article 50?
- Mark Elliott: Reflections on the HS2 case: a hierarchy of domestic constitutional norms and the qualified primacy of EU law
- Philip Allott: The Problem of Direct Democracy: Brexit and the Tyranny of the Majority
Archives
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
Categories
- Administrative law
- America
- Australia
- Canada
- Caribbean
- China
- Comparative law
- Constitution-Making
- Constitutional change
- Constitutional reform
- Current Survey
- Devolution
- England
- Europe
- European Central Bank
- European Union
- Events
- France
- Germany
- Hong Kong
- Human rights
- IACL
- India
- International law
- Ireland
- Italy
- Judicial review
- Judiciary
- New Zealand
- Northern Ireland
- Scotland
- Spain
- Teaching
- UK government
- UK Parliament
- UKCLA
- Uncategorized
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Wales
