Skip to content

UK Constitutional Law Association

Main navigation
  • Home
  • About UKCLA
    • About UKCLA
    • People
    • Membership
  • The Blog
    • The Blog
    • How to use it
  • IACL
  • Events
  • PL Current Survey
  • Contact

Investigatory Powers Tribunal

Daniella Lock: The Third Direction Case Part Two: The Doctrine of Necessary Implication and Uncertainty in National Security Law

Part One of this post presented the background to the ‘Third Direction’ case, which concerns a recently disclosed […]

UKCLA July 24, 2020 Administrative law, Civil Liberties, Comparative law, Human rights, Judicial review, United Kingdom

Daniella Lock: The ‘Third Direction case’ Part One: Miller (Nos 1 and 2) in the National Security Context?

The ‘Third Direction case’, soon to be brought before the Court of Appeal, concerns the lawfulness of a […]

UKCLA July 7, 2020 Administrative law, Civil Liberties, Human rights, Judicial review, United Kingdom

Hanna Wilberg: The Limits of the Rule of Law’s Demands: Where Privacy International Abandons Anisminic

U U Read More

Statutory ouster of judicial review has long been considered to offend the rule of law.  But just what […]

Constitutional Law Group September 11, 2019 Judicial review, UK Parliament

Mike Gordon: Privacy International, Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Synthetic Constitution

U U Read More

The case of R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal  is the latest in a series of high […]

Constitutional Law Group June 26, 2019 Judicial review

Anurag Deb: Privacy International: A Matter of Constitutional Logic and Judicial Trust?

U U Read More

Introduction The High Court and Court of Appeal decisions in Privacy International v IPT have ignited the debate […]

Constitutional Law Group January 8, 2019 Judicial review

Adam Tucker: Parliamentary Intention, Anisminic, and the Privacy International Case (Part Two)

U U Read More

In Part 1, I cast Anisminic as an example of a common law doctrine of interpretation which can […]

Constitutional Law Group December 19, 2018 Judicial review

Adam Tucker: Parliamentary Intention, Anisminic, and the Privacy International Case (Part One)

U U Read More

Introduction Earlier this month, the Supreme Court heard argument in R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal. This […]

Constitutional Law Group December 18, 2018 Judicial review

Hayley J. Hooper: Balancing Access to Justice and the Public Interest: Privacy International and Ouster Clauses in the Broader Constitutional Context

U U Read More

In November 2017, the Court of Appeal in R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal unanimously held that […]

Constitutional Law Group February 12, 2018 Administrative law, Judicial review, UK Parliament

Thomas Fairclough: Privacy International: Constitutional Substance over Semantics in Reading Ouster Clauses

U U Read More

I have previously written on this blog and elsewhere about statutory interpretation and the rule of law. In […]

Constitutional Law Group December 4, 2017 Judicial review
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Home
  • About UKCLA
  • Blog
  • Blog: How to use it
  • Contact
  • Events
  • IACL
  • Membership
  • People
  • PhD Register
  • PL Current Survey
Secondary navigation
  • Twitter
  • Search

Begin typing your search above and press return to search. Press Esc to cancel.

  • Follow Following
    • UK Constitutional Law Association
    • Join 16,728 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • UK Constitutional Law Association
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...