Constitutional lawyers often point to key cases as milestones in public law. Recently, the Supreme Court decision in […]
Category Archive: Judicial review
The brilliant accident of our form of constitutionalism is not just that the executive came to be accountable […]
In R (Miller) and Others v The Prime Minister (hereinafter Miller No.2), the High Court of England and […]
Statutory ouster of judicial review has long been considered to offend the rule of law. But just what […]
While the prorogation of Parliament has generated political controversy, constitutional lawyers are asking whether the government acted legally […]
Two years ago on this blog, we drew attention to the immigration judicial review system—by far the most […]
Introduction The treatment of ouster clauses in R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal has been said to […]
In a recent Times article, Lord Pannick QC – leading Counsel in the Miller litigation – argues that […]
In the recent case of R (Campaign Against Arms Trade) v Secretary of State for International Trade [2019] (hereinafter […]
The case of R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal is the latest in a series of high […]
