If the phrase “may you live in interesting times” actually has its roots in a curse, then, we […]
Category Archive: Judicial review
The current dramatic interaction between the Government, Parliament and the courts means that we are witnessing one of […]
A central theme of the High Court judgment in Miller v Prime Minister is that there is ‘no […]
Constitutional lawyers often point to key cases as milestones in public law. Recently, the Supreme Court decision in […]
The brilliant accident of our form of constitutionalism is not just that the executive came to be accountable […]
In R (Miller) and Others v The Prime Minister (hereinafter Miller No.2), the High Court of England and […]
Statutory ouster of judicial review has long been considered to offend the rule of law. But just what […]
While the prorogation of Parliament has generated political controversy, constitutional lawyers are asking whether the government acted legally […]
Two years ago on this blog, we drew attention to the immigration judicial review system—by far the most […]
Introduction The treatment of ouster clauses in R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal has been said to […]
