The Guardian has published an ICM poll on the Alternative Vote that shows a strong lead for the no campaign, with 44% against and 33% in favour of change. Perhaps even more worrying for the yes campaign, of those intending to vote, 58% say they oppose AV. This result is the same as that reported in YouGov’s most recent poll, commissioned by The Sun.
Follow us on Twitter
- Dorota Leczykiewicz: Melloni and the future of constitutional conflict in the EU wp.me/p1cVqo-uH via @wordpressdotcom 25 minutes ago
- Alison L. Young: Fact/Law – a Flawed Distinction? wp.me/p1cVqo-uD via @wordpressdotcom 1 day ago
- Paul Daly: Death, Democracy and Delegation wp.me/p1cVqo-uv via @wordpressdotcom 1 week ago
- Events in June: (1) political influences, (2) transnational human rights litigation and (3) dissenting judgments wp.me/p1cVqo-us 1 week ago
- Tarunabh Khaitan: Caste as Race—A Welcome First Step wp.me/p1cVqo-um via @wordpressdotcom 1 week ago
Blogroll
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
-
Recent Posts
- Dorota Leczykiewicz: Melloni and the future of constitutional conflict in the EU
- Alison L. Young: Fact/Law – a Flawed Distinction?
- News: CONREASON Project
- Paul Daly: Death, Democracy and Delegation
- Events in June: (1) political influences, (2) transnational human rights litigation and (3) dissenting judgments
Categories
Tags
Alternative vote America Australia Axa Insurance Brighton Declaration Canada constitutionalism constitutional review Constitutional Statutes Constitutional Theory Data Protection Democracy Devolution European Court of Human RIghts European Union European Union Act 2011 freedom of expression House of Lords house of lords constitution committee House of Lords Reform Human Rights Human Rights Act Human Rights Act Reform Human Rights Commission Internet Ireland judicial appointments Judicial Review Judiciary Justice and Security Bill Leveson Inquiry Monarchy National Security Law New Zealand Northern Ireland Parliament Parliamentary sovereignty Referendums Relationship Between European and National Law Role of the European Court of Human Rights Rule of Law Scotland Scottish Independence Scottish Referendum statutory interpretation
UK Constitutional Law Group · affiliated to the IACL
If a candidate can win a seat with as little as 26% of the share of a vote (eg. the constituency of Nairn & Lochaber in 1992), then you can make a strong case for introducing more proportionality into the voting system. Whether AV can achieve this is doubted I’m afraid.
The decline in support for the traditional two parties probably highlights the need for some sort of alternative – assuming parties still matter to us, of course. More worrying though is the fact that turnouts for the last 3 general elections have been sub 70%.
What is often overlooked, however, is the issue of constituency apportionment. Some votes are ‘worth more’ in one constituency eg. Orkney & Shetland, and less in another eg. Isle of Wight. The Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill 2010-11, which caused much anguish to their Lordships, has received Royal Assent and appears to address this concern at long last. To what extent though will remain to be seen.